Before introducing the topic of this essay, lets take a step back. The opening inquiry that needs to be addressed is whether society sees prostitution as a predicament. Is prostitution seen as an inevitable and requisite profession, an occupation that has consistently existed as the oldest profession in the world? Or do we recognize that hooking is a violation of nationwide human entitlement, such as equality? First, if unaware of prostitution, “Prostitution is the exchange of sex for money, a practice that for the most part involves men buying sex from women, boys, or girls” (Mankiller 1). The contemporary matter is whether to legalize it or not. In my opinion, prostitution should not be legalized because it diminishes the well-being of women, leads to drug abuse, and provides an uncomplicated insult to the concept of gender equality.Initially, prostitution should not be legalized because it poses a significant hazard for people involved in the business. Ranging from abuse to death, prostitutes face a hand full of complications with this wise choice of a career. It is argued by legalization advocates that if prostitution was regulated by the state, then the violence and health effects suffered by women would diminish (Leuchtag 8). However, when researching prostitution, multiple resources have proven that theory to be false. For example, Leuchtag includes evidence from a pamphlet about legalizing prostitution, “In the pamphlet entitled Legalizing Prostitution Is Not the Answer: The Example of Victoria, Australia, published by the CATW in 2001, Mary Sullivan and Sheila Jeffreys describe the way legalization in Australia has perpetuated and strengthened the culture of violence and exploitation inherent in prostitution. Under legalization, legal and illegal brothels have proliferated, and trafficking in women has accelerated to meet the increased demand. Pimps, having even more power, continue threatening and brutalizing the women they control. Buyers continue to abuse women, refuse to wear condoms, and spread the HIV virus–and other sexually transmitted diseases–to their wives and girlfriends” (Leuchtag 8). Prostitution generates a setting whereby felonies against women become a commercial enterprise. The fact that a customer gives money to a prostitute for surrendering to these acts merely redefines these felonies as prostitution, thus creating danger in the field of prostitution and making more reason for it to not be legal.Similarly, the dangers of prostitution go beyond physical abuse. A common consequence of prostitution is the high risk for obtaining a sexually transmitted disease. Wilma Mankiller and others, in an article about prostitution, talk about the dangers of prostitution. According to Mankiller, “Female prostitutes, who often have multiple sex partners daily, are in the highest risk category for AIDS. Even in the face of the increased threat of death from AIDS, prostitution has massively increased globally” (Mankiller 2). In order to slow the global spread of transmitted diseases, people should focus their efforts on abolishing prostitution, not legalizing it. In the state Victoria in Australia, University of British Columbia law professor Benjamin Perrin, says the hypocrisy of the law is an offence for the woman prostitute to be in a whorehouse with a sexually transmitted disease, but no such restriction pertains to the prostitutes’ client (Corbella 3). Perrin further explains this phenomenon, “‘So, the john is promised a disease-free woman to purchase and do with as they choose, but that woman, who these regulations are supposedly made for her safety, she’s not given the same privilege to know that the person who is buying her is not infected with a life-threatening disease'” (Corbella 3). Regardless of prostitution position, legal or illegal, it is exceptionally dangerous for women. It minimizes women to a commodity to be bought, sold and abused.Similarly, drug abuse is a recurrent consequence of prostitution. If legalized, the rate at which prostitutes avail themselves of drugs will increase. Women frequently report needing something to numb their feelings to get through anonymous sexual contacts (Mankiller 2). Pimps routinely commerce in drugs and, in addition, appease the prostitutes with these drugs. Generally, addictions are enough to help prostitutes distance themselves emotionally from the sex trafficking and the client. However, such drug repercussions do not prevent them from engaging in prostitution entirely. “There is no way to make it safe, and it should be possible to eradicate it. Abolitionists reject the sanitising description of “sex worker”, and regard prostitution as a form of violence in a neoliberal world in which human flesh has come to be viewed as a commodity, like a burger” (Bindel 2). A commodity is a raw material that can be bought and sold, such as copper or coffee. Women certainly do not belong in a category relating to products being bought and sold. Furthermore, it should be a threat to keep prostitution in the running of being legalized due to the drug use of prostitutes and pimps. Validating prostitution and moving it indoors will not make sex trafficking any more secure. In fact, legitimizing prostitution will make things worse for vulnerable women and girls.Additionally, prostitution should be unauthorized because it strengthens women’s maltreatment by male-dominated societies and grants an explicit offense to the notion of gender equality. Licia Corbella’s article on how liberalized laws make prostitution more dangerous includes, “If the laws are liberalized, the police will have no way to go into these places to rescue the victims of human trafficking,” she said Wednesday from Toronto, where she was forced to work as a sex slave after responding to an ad in her native Hungary to work as a waitress in Canada (Corbella 3). Prostitution is a particularly gendered affair in which most instances women are selling their bodies to men, either by force or permission. Men are constructing use of female bodies for their erotic impulses whenever they sense the demand to do so. This devises a society where men present greater power than women. Given this disparity of power, the proposition that prostitutes should stand up for carnal fairness or make an effort to reverse sexual dominance in courtesy of women, is merely hypothetical. It is largely acknowledged that brutality on women is identical to the formation of gender equality. One of the most grave and ruinous practices of violence based on gender is the commercial exploitation of women, including prostitution. There are women who are raped, physically abused, and those who develop disorders due to prostitution. Corbella also includes, “‘Striking down these laws will hand the victims on a silver platter over to the human traffickers and that means pimps are going to become legitimate businessmen and more women and girls will be sold, trafficked and victimized,’ she said” (Corbella 3). Extracting the legal barricade will communicate to new generations of men that women are solely sexual commodities.Conversely, since it already happens, why not manage it? Prostitution is a woman’s prerogative, a business, and a configuration of sexual freedom. If prostitution were regulated, it would assemble an opportunity for women to be safer by making sure they are protected. Some people may ask, why is such a taboo profession so appealing to women? Back in the day, it was typical for women involved in prostitution to make anywhere from $25,000 to $400,000 compared to women who worked with their hands who made anywhere from $6 to $6,000 (Lopez 1). A handful of organizations have grasped the fact that when prostitution is illegal, it is hazardous for prostitutes to report to the supremacy when they are subjugated or abused. Mentioned in Lopez article about legalizing prostitution, “The Sex Workers Outreach Project agreed that decriminalization led to better health for sex workers, and enabled them to be covered by the standard features of the labor market, including insurance, occupational health and safety programs, and rules of fair trading” (Lopez 2). Moreover, just by legalizing prostitution, this profession can evolve into a sheltered environment for those captivated by it. Similarly, legalizing prostitution would supply the same effect as legalizing marijuana would: tax money. Included in Lopez’s article, “Another argument for the repeal of restrictive legislation is the practical benefits, in addition to extending individual liberty. In Colorado, the desire to tax the marijuana industry was a major motivation for legalization. And the original impetus for the legalization of the sex industry in New South Wales was an inquiry into police corruption that showed that the sex industry was a major source of police bribes. Legalization ended that in a single stroke” (Lopez 3). In other words, once the applicant has successfully obtained a license she may work at a brothel, enjoying legal income taxable at the appropriate rate. Say the average employee has an income of around $100,000. Based on this information, each licensed sex worker would bestow an estimated $20,000 in federal income taxes each year. Taking into consideration that there are more than a million prostituted women in America, the tax revenue produced by this business becomes a confounding $20 billion per year. All this tax money could be utilized to generate shelters for the homeless as well as more professions for those anchored in an unsound business.Overall, legalizing prostitution poses a threat to the women involved in the business. Hazards to the common well-being of women would dramatically decrease if the government recognized that prostitution assembles serious mental and physical trauma for those caught in its trap. Rather than legalizing prostitution, generating a job market that supplies plenty of well-paying jobs would make sure that women never have to contemplate becoming a sex-worker. A handful of women who have experienced prostitution, or are against prostitution, have created organizations to help women embroiled in prostitution. Prostitution is by definition degrading to women. It minimizes them to commodities to be purchased, traded, and mistreated.